Tantra massage oslo teen shemale

tantra massage oslo teen shemale

Resource Exchange or WikiProject Medicine's talk page to either provide an electronic copy or read the source. Popular press edit The popular press is generally not a reliable source for scientific and medical information in articles. This is because primary biomedical literature is exploratory and often not reliable, and any given primary source may be contradicted by another. Such reviews typically do not contain primary research, but can make interpretations and draw conclusions from primary sources that no Wikipedia editor would be allowed. Public Understanding of Science. Retrieved ee this discussion of how to identify shill academic articles cited in Wikipedia. Studies cited or mentioned in Wikipedia should be put in context by using high-quality secondary sources rather than by using the primary sources. Claims of bias should not be made lightly  if you simply call out results as biased, you may introduce your own bias. Assess evidence quality edit When writing about treatment efficacy, knowledge about the quality of the evidence helps distinguish between minor and major views, determine due weight, and identify accepted evidence-based information. Text that relies on primary sources should usually have minimal undue weight, only be used to describe conclusions made by the source, and must describe these findings clearly so that all editors even those without specialist knowledge can check sources. Ideal sources for biomedical information include: review articles (especially systematic reviews ) published in reputable medical journals ; academic and professional books written by experts in the relevant fields and from respected publishers; and guidelines or position statements from national or international expert bodies. National Institutes of Health and Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, and the World Health Organization. Archived from the original on June 15, 2011. Carl Straumsheim No More 'Beall's List', archived from the original on Nestle, Marion. 1, for this reason, all biomedical information must be based on reliable, third-party published secondary sources, and must accurately reflect current knowledge. tantra massage oslo teen shemale

: Tantra massage oslo teen shemale

Teen sex porn sexy lesbian porn 924
Store bryster pupper video bibliotekar Further reading edit Greenhalgh T (2006). Bias edit Bias caused by conflicts of interest is an important issue in medical research. Annals of Internal Medicine. Sources for evaluating health-care media coverage include the review websites Behind the Headlines or Health News Review along with specialized academic journals, such as the Journal of Health Communication ; reviews can also appear in the American Journal of Public. Their name is somewhat of a misnomer as they do not need to concern "technology" as perceived by the public  but rather any intervention intended to improve health.
Porn amature danske pornofilmer 296
Tantra massage oslo teen shemale 618
Skitten vask kurv anal plugg leketøy 142

Videos

Fucking hot redhead mommy in her house.

Tantra massage oslo teen shemale -

"A systematic examination of the citation of prior research in reports of randomized, controlled trials". Journals may specialize in particular article types. Many, but not all, papers published in medical journals are primary sources for facts about the research and discoveries made. "Abridged Index Medicus (AIM or "Core Clinical Journal Titles". Archived from the original on To determine if a journal is medline indexed, go to this website, and search for the name of the journal. The "Limits" tab can further limit the search, for example, to meta-analyses, to freely readable sources, and/or "core clinical journals". "How do US journalists cover treatments, tests, products, and procedures? Such articles may be based uncritically on a press release, which themselves promote research with uncertain relevance to human health and do not acknowledge important limitations, even when issued by an academic medical center. Conference abstracts present incomplete and unpublished data and undergo varying levels of review; they are often unreviewed and their initial conclusions may have changed dramatically if and when the data are finally ready for publication. "Papers that summarise other papers (systematic reviews and meta-analyses (PDF).

: Tantra massage oslo teen shemale

Such supplements, and those that do not clearly declare their editorial policy and conflicts of interest, should not be cited. Science and Technology Resources: A Guide for Information Professionals and Researchers. "Seeking health information online: does Wikipedia matter?". They take into account various aspects such as effect, risks, economic costs, and ethical concerns of a treatment. Sponsored supplements edit See also: WP:sponsored Symposia and supplements to academic journals are often (but far from always) unacceptable sources. Health Sciences Literature Review Made Easy. Controversies or uncertainties in medicine should be supported by reliable secondary sources describing the varying viewpoints. Note that journals that have changed names or ceased publication will not be "currently" indexed on medline, but their indexing status, when they were being published, can be viewed under other headings on that same page. Determining the reliability of any individual journal article may also take into account whether the article has garnered significant positive citations in sources of undisputed reliability, suggesting wider acceptance in the medical literature despite any red flags suggested here.

Facebook twitter google_plus reddit pinterest linkedin mail

3 tanker om “Tantra massage oslo teen shemale

Legg igjen en Kommentar